• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Griffin v. Menard, Inc., No. 21S-CT-119, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 19, 2021).

October 26, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, S. David, Supreme

When a box opened at the bottom and injured store customer, plaintiffs’ designated evidence did not create an issue of material fact to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ res ipsa loquitur claim also failed.

Miller v. Patel, No. 21S-CT-455, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 7, 2021).

October 12, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act’s statute of limitations does not preempt an amendment under Trial Rule 15(C).

Rotert v. Stiles, No. 21S-TR-452, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 8, 2021).

October 12, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Statutory prohibition against restraints on marriage applies only to a devise to a spouse by will and not to other dispositions, like a trust.

Bradbury v. State, No. 21S-PC-441, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 1, 2021).

October 4, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, S. David, Supreme

Trial counsel was not ineffective for stipulating that defendant’s alleged accomplice, was convicted of murder because the stipulation did not relieve the State of the burden to prove defendant’s intent. Trial counsel pursued a reasonable all-or-nothing strategy when he chose not to seek a lesser-included instruction on reckless homicide.

Ramirez v. State, 20S-LW-430, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 23, 2021).

September 27, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

The trial court properly exercised its discretion with the respect to the admission of evidence and providing a supplemental jury instruction. Moreover, the imposition of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole was not inappropriate.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 24
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to page 28
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs