• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Andrew Nemeth Properties, LLC v. Panzica, No. 24S-PL-356, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 6, 2025).

November 10, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: D. Molter, Supreme

Becoming an LLC member requires either a written agreement or written confirmation. The constitutional right to a jury trial in civil cases covers unjust enrichment claims for a money judgment and the unclean hands doctrine applies to those claims.

Baldwin v. Standard Fire Ins. Co., No. 25S-CT-33, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 21, 2025).

October 27, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Slaughter, J. When insurance coverage is insufficient to satisfy multiple claimants, insurers face a dilemma. An insurer can seek individual settlements, but this approach risks exhausting policy limits before satisfying all claimants. Another option is to refrain from individual settlements in hopes of attaining a global settlement, but this approach may fail and expose the […]

O’Connell v. Clay, No. 25S-MI-34, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 16, 2025).

October 20, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, Supreme

Paternity by estoppel applies to grandparents’ visitation. Grandparent had standing under the Grandparent Visitation Act to petition for visitation with grandchild when custodial mother stipulated to the father’s paternity in an agreed visitation order.

Indianapolis Public Trans. Co. v. Bush, No. 25S-CT-245, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 15, 2025).

September 22, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, Supreme

When a party raises a TR 50(A) argument in a Rule 59(J) motion to correct error, the trial court reviews the evidence as if it were considering a TR 50(A) motion raised before judgment at trial; de novo review is appropriate. When the evidence heard by the jury supports reasonable inferences that defendant was not contributorily negligent, the trial court properly did not disturb the jury verdict.

Perry County v. Huck, No. 24S-PL-297, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 22, 2025).

July 28, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, L. Rush, M. Massa, Supreme

Local elected officials may be designated as part-time employees, which permits the county to exclude them from group health insurance.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 174
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs