• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

In re Adoption of Infants H, No. 29S02-0904-CV-140, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Apr. 8, 2009)

April 9, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

Supreme Court reversed trial court’s final adoption order, because it was improper to waive various legislative safeguards designed to protect infants who are proposed for adoption, including the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children.

Gray v. State, No. 10S01-0808-CR-476, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar. 31, 2009)

April 3, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

Defendant’s behavior and statements at the two separate robberies were sufficient, without more, to prove that he had a “gun” in his pocket, but his apprehension immediately after the second robbery with only an electric shaver in his pocket precluded an “armed” enhancement for that robbery.

Estate of Mintz v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., No. 49S05-0805-CV-214, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Mar. 25, 2009)

March 27, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Proximate cause, comparative fault allocation, and whether (and to what extent) defendant acted as a “reasonably prudent person” are questions of fact for the fact-finder to resolve.

In re Paternity of K.I., No. 13S05-0805-JV-213, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Mar. 25. 2009)

March 27, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Whether a grandparent is entitled to visitation when custody is modified from that grandparent to a natural parent is determined by the grandparent visitation statute, not the de facto custodian statute.

Jackson v. Scheible, No. 03S01-0807-CV-390, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar. 10, 2009)

March 13, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme, T. Boehm

Restatement of Torts 363 on liability of a land possessor for harm caused by trees can apply to a seller of the land if the seller retains possession or control of routine maintenance; in this case buyer had possession and seller was not liable.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 166
  • Go to page 167
  • Go to page 168
  • Go to page 169
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to page 171
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs