• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

SCOTUS

Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, No. 07-591, __ U.S. __ (June 25, 2009)

June 26, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Kennedy, A. Scalia, C. Thomas, SCOTUS

Admission of government lab technicians’ sworn “certificates of analysis” that substance taken from defendant was cocaine violated defendant’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right; the certificates were “affidavits” and within the “core class of testimonial statements” defined in Crawford v. Washington.

Montejo v. Arizona, No. 07-1529, __ U.S. __ (May 26, 2009)

June 5, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, S. Breyer, SCOTUS

Overrules Michigan v. Jackson holding that once a suspect has claimed the Sixth Amendment right to a lawyer, any later waiver of that right during police questioning would be invalid, unless the suspect initiates communication with the officers.

Arizona v. Gant, No. 07-542, __ U.S. __ (April 21, 2009)

April 24, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, J. Stevens, S. Alito, S. Breyer, SCOTUS

Police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest only if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.

Rivera v. Illinois, No. 07-9995, __ U.S. __ (Mar. 27, 2009)

April 3, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Ginsburg, SCOTUS

State law, not the Constitution, determines the consequences of an erroneous denial of a peremptory challenge, when all jurors selected are qualified and unbiased.

Wyeth v. Levine, No. 06-1249, ___ U.S. ___ (Mar. 4, 2009) (excerpts from syllabus)

March 20, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: J. Stevens, SCOTUS

Federal law does not pre-empt plaintiff’s claim that a drug label approved by the FDA did not contain an adequate warning about a particular method of administration.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs