Ind. Admin. Rule 14(B) permits remote participation in juvenile disposition-modification hearings where the parties have agreed or where the court issues a good cause order based on the factors listed in the rule including the child’s best interest.
S. David
Rodriguez v. State, No. 18S-CR-143, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug, 7, 2019).
Courts may modify a sentence only if the new sentence would not have violated the terms of the valid plea agreement had the new sentence been originally imposed
State v. Stafford, No. 39S04-1712-CR-749, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 7, 2019).
Companion case to Rodriguez v. State reaffirming that trial courts are bound by the terms of a plea agreement and may only modify a sentence in a way that would have been authorized at the time of sentencing.
Murray v. Indianapolis Public Schools, No. 19S-CT-282, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 8, 2019).
Student was contributorily negligent for his death when his leaving school to purchase either guns or drugs was not an exercise of reasonable care and caution for his safety.
IBM v. State, No. 49D01-1005-PL-21451, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 26, 2019).
Under Ind. Code § 34-13-1-6, post-judgment interest runs from the judgment on remand.