The “valid prescription” requirement is intended to assure the prescription was not obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit and thus, an expired prescription is still a “valid prescription” under Ind. Code § 35-48-4-6(a).
R. Altice
Harvey v. Keyed In Property Management, LLC, No. 20A-SC-1459, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Feb. 26, 2021).
Under Small Claims Rule 8(c), an LLC using a full-time employee to represent it can allege damages above $1,500 and waive net damages in excess of the jurisdictional limit; setoffs and counterclaims were not subtracted from the jurisdictional limit.
Smith v. State, 20A-CR-1014, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 20, 2021).
In a trial in absentia, it is not error for the trial court to inform the jury that defendant was personally notified of the trial date.
Temme v. State, 20A-CR-275, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 20, 2020).
Because Indiana has a statutory scheme for the award of credit time, the equitable, common law doctrine of “credit for time erroneously at liberty,” does not apply.
State v. Stone, No. 20A-CR-421, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2020).
An informant’s declaration against penal interest can furnish sufficient basis for establishing the informant’s credibility.