• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

P. Mathias

Marion County Auditor v. Saw Mill Creek, LLC, No. 49A02-0912-CV-1192, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 3, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Statutory requirement that auditor send a first-class mail notice of tax due to property owner when initial certified mail notice is returned undelivered must be complied with to comport with due process.

M.S. v. C.S., No. 03A01-1003-DR-140, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 7, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Child custody statute does not authorize a parent to obtain “joint custody with third parties by simply filing a joint petition with a trial court, because to do so would allow parents and third parties to circumvent the requirements of the Adoption Act.”

Britt v. State, No. 02A03-1004-CR-253, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 1, 2010)

December 3, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Britt v. State (Ind. Ct. App., Mathias, J.)-When robbery defendant called his brother as a witness and did not attack the brother’s credibility, the brother’s prior robbery conviction was inadmissible character evidence.

Parish v. State, No. 02A03-1002-CR-74, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 9, 2010)

November 12, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias, P. Riley

When officer knew motorist stopped for a traffic violation and handcuffed outside the vehicle for safety was a suspect in shootings, her protective search of passenger compartment permissibly included unlocking the glove box to check it for weapons.

Arlton v. Schraut, No. 79A02-0906-CV-541, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 9, 2010)

November 12, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Deliberating jury should have been provided with a computer or some other method to view CD exhibits containing high-resolution digital images of plaintiff’s pre-surgery retina; failure of court to provide a viewing method or to give tendered instruction that jury could ask to view the CD images in open court was reversible error.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 23
  • Go to page 24
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to page 27
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs