• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

M. Massa

Cardosi v. State, No. 18S-LW-181, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., August 7, 2019).

August 12, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction of murder and sentence to life in prison without parole upheld, finding that the evidence was sufficient, jurors were properly admonished, co-conspirator’s text messages were properly admitted, reading a withdrawn accomplice liability instruction was not improper, and court properly considered a non-statutory aggravator when imposing sentence.

Horner v. Curry, No. 18S-PL-333, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2019).

July 1, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, M. Massa, Supreme

It is constitutional that the legislature has directed that funds collected under the Indiana’s Civil Forfeiture Statute reimburse law enforcement costs before the transfer of proceeds from seized property to the Common School Fund.

Batchelor v. State, No. 18S-CR-436, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 18, 2019).

March 25, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

For the resisting-by-fleeing offense, trial courts should use Indiana Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction 5.3040, and discontinue using Instruction 22.

Bobadilla v. State, No. 19S-PC-128, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 5, 2019).

March 11, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

Trial counsel provided constitutionally deficient performance by not inquiring into his client’s citizenship status before entering into a plea agreement that eventually led to his deportation.

Barcroft v. State, No. 18S-CR-135, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 3, 2018).

December 10, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

The evidence of defendant’s demeanor—taken together with the flaws in the expert opinion testimony and the absence of a well-documented history of mental illness—was sufficient to support the court’s finding of guilty but mentally ill (GBMI).

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs