• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

L. Rush

Becker v. State, No. 45S03-1301-CR-9, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Aug. 22, 2013).

August 29, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Under a supreme court 2011 decision, Indiana ex post facto law would have allowed lifetime sex offender registration to apply to Becker, but a 2008 trial court ruling to the contrary was res judicata against the State on the issue, as the local prosecutor’s representation in the 2008 litigation was in privity with the DOC’s intervention in 2011 seeking to impose lifetime registration status based on the 2011 opinion.

In Re Adoption of C.B.M. & C.R.M, No. 37S03-1303-AD-159, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Aug. 16, 2013).

August 22, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

The adoption of two children was voidable under T.R. 60(B)(7) when the natural mother’s termination of parental rights was reversed on appeal.

N. L. v. State, No. 47S01-1302-JV-126, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 1, 2013).

July 3, 2013 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

To order a delinquent child to register as a sex offender, the juvenile court must first hold an evidentiary hearing and “expressly” find “by clear and convincing evidence that the juvenile is likely to commit another sex offense.”

KJ.R. v. M.A.B., No. 41S01-1209-MI-00556,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., March 7, 2013).

March 8, 2013 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Grandparent visitation was order was voidable, because it failed to address required findings, and was remanded to correct those defects through new findings and conclusions.

K.W. v. State, No. 49S02-1301-JV-20, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 22, 2013)

February 28, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Evidence was insufficient to prove element of “forcibly” resisting law enforcement; suggests legislative scrutiny of distinction between law enforcement officer and school-discipline officer for purposes of resisting law enforcement offense.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to page 28
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs