• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

L. Rush

State v. Ruiz, No. 19S-CR-336, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 3, 2019).

June 10, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Miranda warnings must be provided when police interrogate someone when their movement is curtailed and they are subjected to coercive pressures.

Fairbanks v. State, No. 18S-CR-604, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 27, 2019).

April 1, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

The State may introduce Rule 404(B) other-bad-acts evidence to show lack of accident only (1) when the State has “reliable assurance” that an accident defense will be raised, or (2) after the defendant places accident at issue at trial, and when the evidence’s prejudicial impact will not substantially outweigh its probative value.

City of Hammond v. Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc., No. 19S-PL-148, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 15, 2019).

March 18, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

The “Fee Exemption” in Ind. Code 36-1-20-5 that allows Bloomington and West Lafayette to charge local landlords any amount to register rental properties is an unconstitutional special law.

Zanders v. State, No. 15S01-1611-CR-571, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 8, 2019).

March 11, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Defendant’s historical cell-site location information (CSLI) required a search warrant, but the admission of the CSLI evidence was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Weisheit v. State, No. 10S00-1507-PD-413, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 7, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, S. David, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction of the murders of two children, arson, death penalty sentence affirmed; finding that although mistakes were made by trial and appellate counsel most of them did not rise to the level of deficient performance under the Strickland decision, and defendant in any case failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs