• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

G. Slaughter

Town of Brownsburg, Ind. v. Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation, No. 19S-PL-342, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 5, 2019).

June 10, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

A trial court hearing a remonstrance proceeding on judicial review must consider the evidence submitted by both the municipality and the remonstrators, and need not defer to either the municipality’s own evidence supporting the annexation or its determination that it met the statutory requirements.

J.W. v. State, No. 19S-JV-12, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 9, 2019).

January 14, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

A juvenile who challenges the validity of a consent judgment must first seek relief from the trial court under Trial Rule 60(B) and is entitled to legal representation in doing so.

Moriarity v. Ind. Dept. of Natural Resources, No. 18S-PL-00296, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 3, 2019).

January 7, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Dept. of Natural Resources had jurisdiction over dam on private property based on its location in, on, or along a stream of Indiana.

Town of Ellettsville v. DeSpirito, No. 53S01-1709-PL-612, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 29, 2018).

December 3, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Relocating a fixed easement requires the consent of all affected estate-holders.

Weisheit v. State, No. 10S00-1507-PD-413, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 7, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, S. David, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction of the murders of two children, arson, death penalty sentence affirmed; finding that although mistakes were made by trial and appellate counsel most of them did not rise to the level of deficient performance under the Strickland decision, and defendant in any case failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs