• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

G. Slaughter

Ewing v. State, No. 26S-CR-43, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 12, 2026).

February 16, 2026 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: D. Molter, G. Slaughter, Supreme

A prosecutor cannot seek a sanction for violating the rules of work release or probation that is different than the sanction sought in the revocation petition(s) that is (are) the subject of a final revocation hearing.

Anderson v. State, No. 25S-CR-294, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 13, 2025).

November 17, 2025 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

A sentence is illegal if it is outside the prescribed statutory range or is unconstitutional. An appeal challenging an illegal sentence cannot be waived.

Baldwin v. Standard Fire Ins. Co., No. 25S-CT-33, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 21, 2025).

October 27, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Slaughter, J. When insurance coverage is insufficient to satisfy multiple claimants, insurers face a dilemma. An insurer can seek individual settlements, but this approach risks exhausting policy limits before satisfying all claimants. Another option is to refrain from individual settlements in hopes of attaining a global settlement, but this approach may fail and expose the […]

Indianapolis Public Trans. Co. v. Bush, No. 25S-CT-245, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 15, 2025).

September 22, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, Supreme

When a party raises a TR 50(A) argument in a Rule 59(J) motion to correct error, the trial court reviews the evidence as if it were considering a TR 50(A) motion raised before judgment at trial; de novo review is appropriate. When the evidence heard by the jury supports reasonable inferences that defendant was not contributorily negligent, the trial court properly did not disturb the jury verdict.

Kelly v. Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, No. 25S-CT-158, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 23, 2025).

June 30, 2025 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, L. Rush

The Legislature has not created a private right of action for individuals to seek damages stemming from inaccurate BMV recordkeeping.

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs