• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Goff

Davis v. State, No. 22S-CR-253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 3, 2023)(opinion on rehearing).

October 10, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, Supreme

When a defendant waives the right to pursue their sentence as part of a plea agreement, they may not pursue a direct appeal of their sentence even if they can prove they did not knowingly and voluntarily waive the right to do so. A defendant must seek to vacate their guilty plea in post-conviction relief.

Indiana Right to Life Victory Fund v. Morales, No. 23S‐CQ‐108, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 25, 2023).

October 2, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, Supreme

Ind. Code 3-9-2-3 to -6 prohibits or otherwise limits corporate contributions to political action committees or other entities that engage in independent campaign-related expenditures.

Noblesville Ind. Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. FMG Indianapolis, LLC, No. 23S-PL-114, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 25, 2023).

September 25, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

An ambiguous word in a city ordinance is a question of law, which the Court reviews de novo.

Hoosier Contractors, LLC v. Gardner, No. 22S-CT-381, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 19, 2023).

July 25, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

A party must establish standing at each stage of litigation. It is not enough for a claimant to establish injury in its pleadings; it must do so at each successive stage of the litigation.

Harris v. State, No. 23S-CR-165, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 29, 2023).

July 3, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, G. Slaughter, L. Rush

The jury in a habitual offender proceeding must be allowed to make the ultimate legal determination of whether the defendant has the status of habitual offender. Only evidence of the defendant’s alleged convictions is relevant to that determination. A defendant has no constitutional right to present irrelevant evidence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs