• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

B. Dickson

State v. Harper, No. 79S02-1405-CR-334, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 14, 2014).

May 15, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Under the circumstances of the case the prosecutor’s conduct and communications conveyed approval of a sentence modification after 365 days had passed since sentencing.

Groce v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., No. 48S02-1307-CT-472, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 4, 2014)

April 3, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Affirms summary judgment for defendant, finding the statute of limitation defense applicable when plaintiff, in the exercise of ordinary diligence in reviewing their homeowners insurance policy, could have timely discovered that the company’s replacement cost liability was capped at the dwelling loss coverage limit.

Moryl v. Ransone, No. 46S04-1403-CT-149 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., March 10, 2014).

March 13, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

“[C]ommencement of a medical malpractice action occurs when a copy of the proposed complaint is deposited for mailing by registered or certified mail or by certain private delivery services[.]”

Paul Stieler Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Evansville, No. 82S01-1306-CT-436, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 11, 2014)

February 13, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, L. Rush, Supreme

Amended smoking ban ordinance violates the equal privileges and immunities clause of the Indiana Constitution, voiding the amendment that exempted the riverboat casino.

American Cold Storage v. The City of Boonville, No. 87S01-1303-PL-157, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Jan. 21, 2014).

January 23, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Multiple parcels of land acquired by the state for an adjoining public roadway are counted as one parcel for purposes of determining whether the remonstrating landowners comprise 65% of the owners of the annexed territory.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs