Evidence that a man is not a child’s biological father, without more, is not dispositive of whether he is the child’s legal father or obviate the need for his consent to an adoption.
Appeals
Carmouche v. State, No. 21A-CR-1666, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 17, 2022).
Those charged with misdemeanors waive their right to a jury trial unless they affirmatively assert it, however, the waiver must be made in a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary manner.
Yergy’s State Road BBQ, LLC v. Wells Co. Health Dept., No. 21A-PL-2593, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 19, 2022).
Trial court properly dismissed as moot a complaint regarding the Governor’s face mask requirement during COVID-19 because the executive order was no longer in place.
Smith v. State, No. 21A-CR-2799, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 23, 2022).
Pursuant to Indiana Criminal Rule 4(B), a trial court may continue a trial upon taking note of a congestion or an emergency without the additional requirement of a local emergency.
State v. Lyons, No. 21A-CR-2187, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 11, 2022).
Even in the criminal context, the purpose of Indiana’s discovery rules is to allow a liberal discovery procedure for the purpose of providing litigants with information essential to the litigation of all relevant issues, eliminate surprise, and to promote settlement. When a discovery rule is violated, a trial court has broad discretion to impose sanctions, which may include exclusion of all evidence that might have flowed from the violation.