• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Pistalo v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., No. 45A04-1204-PL-214, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec, 27, 2012).

December 31, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Plaintiff who recovered policy limit from deceased’s auto insurance company and then received an assignment from deceased’s estate of all its rights against insurer thereby had an independent action against the insurer for bad faith failure to settle plaintiff’s claim and could recover prejudgment interest and fees from insurer; reverses summary judgment for insurer on bad faith claim.

Banks v. Banks, No. 45A03-1203-DR-96,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 14, 2012).

December 20, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in modifying and reducing spousal maintenance obligation based on changes in the parties’ respective finances, even when there was no improvement in the medical condition of the party receiving maintenance.

Young v. State, No. 20A04-1112-CR-699, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 11, 2012).

December 13, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

When victim had come to the fire station on her own and was being treated by firemen, her statements in response to firefighters’ questions were not “testimonial” under the Crawford Confrontation Clause rule.

Gingerich v. State, No. 43A05-1101-CR-27, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 11, 2012).

December 13, 2012 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Reverses twelve-year old’s conspiracy to commit murder conviction when counsel had only four days to prepare for waiver of juvenile jurisdiction hearing.

Teague v. State, No. 89A01-1202-CR-86, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2012).

December 7, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Holds under the facts in this case that “a 911 recording that involves statements by a caller that were relayed from a victim [were] admissible where the victim had personal knowledge of the underlying incident but the caller did not,” on the basis that the caller’s frame of mind and lack of opportunity to reflect qualified her 911 statements as excited utterances.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 294
  • Page 295
  • Page 296
  • Page 297
  • Page 298
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs