• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Lebo v. State, No. 46A05-1202-CR-104, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 16, 2012).

November 21, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, J. Baker

The B misdemeanor offense of failure to report child abuse or neglect is a continuing offense, and hence is not subject to the misdemeanor statute of limitations.

White v. State, No. 90A04-1111-CR-621, __N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21,2012),

November 21, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Statements of murder victim were properly admitted under Evidence Rule 804(b)(5), the “forfeiture by wrongdoing” hearsay exception.

Andrews v. State, No. 29A02-1112-MI-1166, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2012).

November 21, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Federal sex offender registry statutes and their obligations for defendant did not affect the Indiana law conclusion that a state resident whose out-of-state sex offense conviction predated Indiana sex offender registry statutes could not, under the Indiana Constitution ex post facto Wallace holding, be required to register on the Indiana registry.

Couch v. State, No. 48A04-1204-CR-181, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 14, 2012).

November 15, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

At sentencing the court heard testimony about other victims’ molestations, which were not to be charged under the plea bargain; caselaw holds conduct for which charges are avoided under a bargain cannot be used to give longer sentences, but here nothing in the record indicated the court considered the testimony as an aggravating factor.

Clanton v. State, No. 49A02-1203-CR-198, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 15, 2012).

November 15, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, J. Baker

Police officer in full uniform working as a private security guard was acting as a law enforcement officer under the circumstances of the case; officer making a Terry frisk could remove sharp object from defendant’s pocket, but when officer realized object was a pen cap and not a weapon he could not take the plastic bag he observed in the cap out and inspect its contents, even though he testified bags in such caps were often used, in his experience, to store narcotics.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 292
  • Go to page 293
  • Go to page 294
  • Go to page 295
  • Go to page 296
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 404
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs