• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Collip v. Ratts, No. 49A05-1501-CT-1, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 31, 2015).

January 4, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Doctors have a duty of reasonable care to a nurse practitioner’s patients in fulfilling the doctor’s obligations under a collaborative practice agreement between the doctor and the nurse practitioner.

State v. J.S., No. 16A04-1503-MI-89, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 28, 2015).

December 28, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Trial court could not prevent the Bureau of Motor Vehicles from disclosing expunged OWI conviction to Commercial Driver’s License Information System. (At issue is the expungement law effective July 1, 2013, which has since been amended.)

Storch v. Provision Living, LLC, No. 49A02-1505-CT-352, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 23, 2015).

December 28, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Estate is entitled to an award of attorney fees for a tort claim pursuant to a contract awarding the prevailing party attorney fees for “any controversy, claim, or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof.”

Blackmon v. State, No. 48A02-1505-CR-270, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 15, 2015).

December 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Trial court did not err in denying Batson challenge, even though one of the State’s two race-neutral reasons for striking prospective juror was suspect and trial court did not specify which reason it found credible; under the “dual-motive” approach, the record showed the State would have exercised the strike even without the suspect reason.

Key v. State, No. 02A04-1507-MI-854, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2015).

December 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court erred in denying expungement without a hearing after the State objected to the petition; expungement statute requires a hearing when the State objects, and expungement could not be summarily denied because defendant was entitled to mandatory expungement of one of his convictions.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 210
  • Page 211
  • Page 212
  • Page 213
  • Page 214
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 408
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs