• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Washington v. State, No. 21A-CR-997, _ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

The market reports exception to hearsay under Evidence Rule 803(17) does not apply to allow the admission of evidence from Drugs.com that was used to identify pills for possession charges.

Wilkes v. Celadon Group, Inc., No. 19S-CT-564, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 6, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Carriers have the primary duty for loading and securing cargo. If the shipper assumes a legal duty of safe loading, it becomes liable for injuries resulting from any latent defect.

Ladra v. State, No. 21S-CT-235, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

When the government knows of an existing defect in a public thoroughfare, and when it has ample opportunity to respond, immunity does not apply simply because the defect manifests during recurring inclement weather.

Staat v. Ind. Dept. of Transportation, No. 21S-CT-240, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

A government entity is “not liable” for a loss or injury resulting from the “temporary condition of a public thoroughfare . . . that results from weather.” Because the evidence designated by the government establishes that the weather-induced condition continued to worsen at the time of the accident, the Court holds that the condition was temporary and the government immune from liability.

Posso v. State, No. 21A-CR-369, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 30, 2021).

December 6, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

A defendant is entitled to be advised of his Indiana constitutional right to the presence and advice of counsel before making the decision to consent to a search of a motel room, vehicle, and/or cell phone.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 91
  • Go to page 92
  • Go to page 93
  • Go to page 94
  • Go to page 95
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs