• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Maryland v. Shatzer, No. 08–680, __ U.S. __ (Feb. 24, 2010)

February 26, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, C. Thomas, J. Stevens, SCOTUS

Adopts a brightline rule that a fourteen-day break in Miranda custody ends the presumption of involuntariness established in Edwards v. Arizona for responses to police-initiated questioning after a subject has invoked the right to have Miranda counsel present during interrogation; a subject incarcerated for an unrelated crime is not in Miranda custody for purposes of this fourteen-day rule.

In re Adoption of L.D., No. 49A02-0907-CV-671, __ N.E.2d. __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2010)

February 26, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Since paternal grandparents adopting their grandchild were adoptive rather than biological grandparents, the maternal grandparent was not eligible for visitation under the Grandparent Visitation Act.

Hampton v. State, No. 49A04-0906-CR-331, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2010)

February 19, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Statute providing that the first thirty years of an A felony child molesting sentence may not be suspended does not operate to change the minimum sentence for such an offense from twenty years to thirty.

Morris v. State, No. 02A03-0905-CR-210 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 9, 2010)

February 19, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Reviews instructing on conversion as a lesser included offense of theft.

Tharp v. State, No. 49A02-0905-CR-394, __ N.E.2D __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 18, 2010)

February 19, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Evidence the protected person or another layperson told the defendant there was a protective order against him does not suffice to prove the protective order knowledge element in the invasion of privacy offense.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 544
  • Go to page 545
  • Go to page 546
  • Go to page 547
  • Go to page 548
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 589
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs