Due process will not permit revocation of juvenile probation when the State has presented no evidence of the alleged probation violations.
Elliott v. Rush Memorial Hosp., No. 70A01-0911-CV-553, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 11, 2010)
Where hospital employee forcibly catheterized plaintiff for a urine sample after an oral statement from the police that the sample was court ordered, plaintiff’s complaint adequately stated factual issues as to whether: (1) the sample was obtained pursuant to a written request, (2) the taking of the sample constituted reasonable force, and (3) forced catheterization constituted a “medically accepted manner” for obtaining a urine sample, all pursuant to Ind. Code § 9-30-6-6. Trial court properly dismissed plaintiff’s medical malpractice complaint, however, because plaintiff was not a “patient” of the defendants.
Whatley v. State, No. 49S02-0908-CR-379, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 8, 2010)
Church with an active youth program was a “youth program center” for purposes of drug offense enhancement.
Malenchik v. State, No. 79S02-0908-CR-365, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., 2010)
“[R]esults of LSI-R and SASSI offender assessment instruments are appropriate supplemental tools for judicial consideration at sentencing.”
J.S. v. State, No. 79S02-1006-CR-296, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 9, 2010)
“[T]he LSI-R score is not in the nature of, nor may it be considered as, an aggravating or mitigating circumstance.”