• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Norris v. Personal Finance, No. 27A04-1104-SC-183, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2011).

November 22, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Parents of competent adults are not included in the list of persons having authority to accept service under T.R. 4.16; service is not adequate on the home of a competent adult’s parents if that adult does not live at that address.

Davis v. Shelter Ins. Companies, No. 02A05-1105-CT-256, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2011).

November 22, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Adopts the following test to determine the availability of equitable estoppel as an affirmative defense against statute of limitations in insurance actions: “The first part of the test, drawing on the national case law, is to determine whether the insurer has engaged in any of the following: (1) a promise to settle; (2) discouraging the claimant from filing suit; (3) discouraging the claimant from obtaining counsel; or (4) otherwise egregious conduct. If one of those behaviors is present, then the court will engage in the second part of the test by looking at the totality of the circumstances surrounding the insurer’s actions. Equitable estoppel will be available to the claimant when the circumstances surrounding the insurer’s conduct have induced the claimant to delay timely action…and the claimant’s reliance on the insurer’s statements or actions was reasonable…” (Internal citations omitted.)

Camm v. State, No. 87A01-1102-CR-25, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. , 2011).

November 18, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Prosecutor’s having signed a contract to write a book about the prosecution, along with indications he still intended to write the book after the second retrial was completed, was an “actual conflict of interest” warranting his replacement with a special prosecutor.

Brent v. State, No. 34A04-1105-CR-268, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2011).

November 18, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Marijuana found on street on passenger’s side of auto, where it may have been thrown from passenger’s window, coupled with driver’s suspicious behavior, was not sufficient to establish the passenger possessed the marijuana.

Carraway v. State, No. 47A01-1104-CR-162, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2011).

November 18, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Trial court’s failure to take guilty plea into account as a mitigating factor required remand for resentencing.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 462
  • Go to page 463
  • Go to page 464
  • Go to page 465
  • Go to page 466
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs