• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Moss v. State, No. 49A02-1307-CR-618, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 20, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

When defendant had his prior felony conviction reduced to a misdemeanor, after he was charged in this case with C felony handgun without a license based on the prior felony, his motion to dismiss the C felony should have been granted even though he had the prior felony conviction when the handgun offense was committed.

In re G.P., No. 49S02-1308-JT-558, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 13, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

A trial court does not have discretion to appoint an attorney to a parent under Ind. Code § 31-34-4-6; Ind. Code § 31-32-4-3 does give the court discretion to appoint an attorney for a parent who fails to meet the statutory requirements for being indigent but for whom appointed counsel might still be appropriate.

Justice v. American Family Ins. Co., No. 49S02-1303-PL-221, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 13, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

In an insurance policy, the phrase “limits of liability of this coverage” refers to the policy limit and not to the insured’s total damages.

Hicks v. State, No. 82A01-1306-CR-256, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 11, 2014).

March 13, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

When “basic questions” asked by police in “pre-interview” did not result in a confession, there was no violation of Missouri v. Seibert’s rule that police cannot purposefully withhold Miranda warnings to get a confession and then secure a Miranda waiver, based on the first confession, before questioning to get a second confession.

In re E.M., No. 45S03-1308-JT-557, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., March 7, 2014).

March 13, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, R. Rucker, Supreme

The trial court was within its discretion to terminate the father’s parental rights.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 388
  • Go to page 389
  • Go to page 390
  • Go to page 391
  • Go to page 392
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs