Although the sellers’ bankruptcy action had been dismissed, bankruptcy court was the proper venue for a quiet title action on property that was part of the bankruptcy estate.
Miller v. Federal Express, Corp., No. 49A02-1307-PL-619, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 4, 2014)
Defendants were immune from suit under the federal Communications Decency Act as “providers of an interactive computer service.”
Groce v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., No. 48S02-1307-CT-472, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 4, 2014)
Affirms summary judgment for defendant, finding the statute of limitation defense applicable when plaintiff, in the exercise of ordinary diligence in reviewing their homeowners insurance policy, could have timely discovered that the company’s replacement cost liability was capped at the dwelling loss coverage limit.
Robinson v. State, No. 20S04-1307-CR-471, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 25, 2014).
Affirms trial court’s denial of motion to suppress based on conclusion that defendant’s driving gave officer reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop, when testimony of officer convinced trial judge there was reasonable suspicion of “unsafe lane movement” even though squad car video did not clearly demonstrate defendant went off the road though his car did contact the fog line.
State v. Keck, No. 67S01-1403-CR-179, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 25, 2014).
Affirms trial court’s grant of motion to suppress which was based on evidence that defendant was permissibly driving “left of center” due to the poor condition of the roadway.