As statute requires a sex offender who moves to report to both the county he is leaving and the county he is moving to, defendant’s convictions for failing to register as a sex or violent offender in both counties were not barred either by statute or double jeopardy principles.
Fischer v. Heymann, No. 49S02-1309-PL-620, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 17, 2014).
Responding to the plaintiff’s demand was not the defendant’s only option to mitigate damages, but the trial court was within its discretion to reduce damages.
Camoplast Crocker, LLC v. Magic Circle Corp., No. 29S02-1407-CT-476, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 21, 2014).
Plaintiff’s amendment of the complaint was proper when it was filed before the two-year limitation period expired, even though the court granted the motion to amend after the limitation period expired.
Willis v. State, No. 49A02-1310-CR-854, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2014).
Affirms criminal trespass conviction based on evidence defendant was seen running near the scene of the alleged crime not long after a security alarm was activated and voices and noises were heard inside the premises.
Wright v. State, No. 45A05-1310-CR-526, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2014).
Removal of juror on basis he was refusing to deliberate was reversible error.