Doctrine of continuing wrong does not apply to doctor’s continued use of disinfectant that caused plaintiff’s allergic reaction in his medical malpractice action.
Teaching Our Posterity Success, Inc. v. Ind. Dept. of Education, No. 49S05-1411-PL-700, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 6, 2014).
A petitioner seeking judicial review of an agency action must file with the trial court the agency record, defined by the Administrative Orders and Procedures Act, or the petition will be dismissed.
Neal v. Austin, No. 49A02-1404-DR-225__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2014).
Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6 “necessitates that where the most recent order establishing a child support obligation was issued after June 30, 2012, the child must file a petition for educational needs before the child becomes nineteen years of age.”
Swallow v. State, No. 89A01-1401-CR-24, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 28, 2014).
Special prosecutor was not required when defense counsel joined the prosecutor’s office as a deputy, since adequate steps were taken to insure that the former defense counsel had no communications of any sort with other members of the prosecutor’s office about defendant’s case.
Campbell v. State, No. 13S05-1410-PC-682, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 30, 2014).
Indiana Pattern Jury Instructions – Criminal No. 9.05’s second sentence in its “intentionally” definition (“[i]f a person is charged with intentionally causing a result by his conduct, it must have been his conscious objective not only to engage in the conduct but also to cause the result”) “represents a correct statement of the law.”