• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

D.Y. v. State, No. 49A02-1405-JV-298, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 11, 2015).

March 12, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

When officer told juvenile he would be transported to the police station, the juvenile was “seized” for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, and as the office had no probable cause to believe the juvenile had committed a crime the firearm the officer found in patting the juvenile down was inadmissible.

Stone v. State, No. 34A02-1410-CR-753, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 12, 2015).

March 12, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

After the trial court had accepted the plea agreement and entered judgment of conviction, defendant’s failure to appear for a presentence investigation did not permit the court to rescind the agreement and vacate the convictions.

In re M.N., No. 53A01-1410-JT-462, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2015).

March 12, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Adoption agency’s ability to file a petition to voluntarily terminate parental rights to not restricted to the scope of its statutory authorization as a licensed child placing agency.

State v. Arnold, No. 22A05-1408-CR-387, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 27, 2015).

March 5, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Motion to set aside habitual offender enhancement should have been treated as a postconviction relief petition; trial court erred by vacating only the habitual enhancement, when the habitual enhancement was an integral part of the plea agreement’s disposition of charged offenses.

Shelton v. State, No. 71A03-1408-Cr-309, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 27, 2015).

March 5, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Search of an offender on community corrections monitored home detention is subject to the reasonable suspicion standard required for probationer searches; in this case, the circumstances conferred the required reasonable suspicion for a warrantless dog sniff search of the offender’s home and garage.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 340
  • Go to page 341
  • Go to page 342
  • Go to page 343
  • Go to page 344
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs