• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Moore v. State, No. 49A05-1408-CR-398, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, M. Robb

Savings statute for the revised penal code did not prohibit application of the revised sentence modification statute, which does not require prosecutorial consent to a modification petition, to a petition to modify a crime committed and sentenced prior to the July 1, 2014 effective date of the modification statute’s revision.

M.M. v. State, No. 49A02-1409-JV-639, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A juvenile restitution order does not end on the juvenile’s discharge from probation, and action to collect the restitution may be taken after the probation ends.

J.B. v. State, No. 49A02-1409-JV-688, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 23, 2005).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Police officer’s temporary detention of juvenile on sidewalk to investigate whether item juvenile had discarded was a handgun was a reasonable action under the totality of the circumstances and did not violate the Indiana Constitution’s search protection in Article 1, Section 11.

Smith v. Foegley Landscape, Inc., No. 71A03-1405-SC-169, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 20, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Submitting an affidavit for attorney’s fees that merely states that as a result of representation plaintiff incurred costs and legal expenses related to the litigation is not enough; the affidavit should contain information concerning the nature of services so the court can evaluate the reasonableness of the fees.

Wellpoint, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, No. 49S05-1404-PL-244, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 22, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Plaintiff is entitled to insurance coverage, including coverage for defense costs, except for its settlement losses.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 334
  • Go to page 335
  • Go to page 336
  • Go to page 337
  • Go to page 338
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 588
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs