• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Spells v. State, No. 23S-CR-232, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 30, 2024).

February 5, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

The statutory cash bail agreement permits application of cash bail to the whole of a defendant’s public-defender costs. However, a court may retain cash bail to pay most other fines, costs, and fees only after considering the defendant’s ability to pay.

Bradley v. State, No. 22A-CR-2317, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2024).

February 5, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, P. Felix

When a trial court sua sponte orders a competency evaluation for a defendant, the early trial period is tolled, and the delay is chargeable to neither the State nor the defendant. Once the competency evaluation is complete and the 70-day early trial period resumes, the State must fulfill its affirmative duty to bring the defendant to trial.

Ping v. Inman, No. 23A-CT-251, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2024).

February 5, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

A trial court should hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of juror misconduct if there is a possibility of juror bias.

In re N.E., No. 23A-JC-996, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2024).

February 5, 2024 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

A litigant’s failure to appear at a hearing should be addressed using the indirect contempt procedure which requires a rule to show cause and a hearing. The trial court erred by relying upon information obtained from the drug testing facility by its court reporter without her testimony under oath.

Land v. IU Credit Union, No. 23S-CP-115, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 1, 2024).

February 5, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

On rehearing, the Court recognizes the practical difficulties that businesses may face in securing affirmative consent to contract modifications from existing customers and notes that it leaves open the possibility of adopting, in the future, a different standard governing the offer and acceptance of unilateral contracts between businesses and consumers.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to page 28
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to page 30
  • Go to page 31
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 589
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs