• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

L.G. v. S.L., No. 29A04-1607-AD-1756, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2017).

May 8, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

There was an appearance of impropriety when the attorney for one side wrote a letter of recommendation for the trial court judge while the case was pending; trial court judge should have recused himself from the proceedings.

Bass v. State, No. 03A01-1606-CR-1493, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 27, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, M. May

Trial court did not remedy defendant’s double jeopardy concern when it entered a judgment of conviction for the offense and its lesser-included offense (Class A misdemeanor OWI and Class C misdemeanor
OwI) and then merged the offenses purposes of sentencing.

KS & E Sports v. Runnels, No. 32S01-1704-PC-226, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 24, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, R. Rucker, Supreme

A firearms seller is immune from a damages suit for injuries caused by another person’s misuse of a firearm, but the seller is not immune from a public nuisance claim seeking equitable relief.

Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc., No. 49S02-1704-CT-253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 26, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

By entering into a contract containing language that required general contractor to assume responsibility for implementing and monitoring safety precautions and programs for all individuals working on the site, and by agreeing to designate a safety representative to supervise such implementation and monitoring, the general contractor affirmatively demonstrated an intent to assume a nondelegable duty of care toward the subcontractor.

Johnson v. State, No. 32A05-1604-CR-703, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 19, 2017).

April 24, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Shepard

Under legislation amended in 2015, if the offender was released more than ten years before the current offense the conviction does not count for habitual offender purposes.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 252
  • Page 253
  • Page 254
  • Page 255
  • Page 256
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 602
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs