• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Fields v. State, No. 43A03-1704-CR-856, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 22, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss charges against him because the arresting officer was acting as a de facto officer and his failure to take the statutory oath was a technical defect.

Bellwether Properties, LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc., No. 53S04-1703-CT-121, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 20, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Because the complaint does not establish that the statute of limitations had already run when the complaint was filed, Defendant’s T.R. 12(B)(6) motion shouldn’t have been granted.

Shirey v. Flenar, No. 02A03-1704-MI-876, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 21, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, N. Vaidik, T. Crone

Doctor had a duty to preserve plaintiff’s medical records and is properly subject to a cause of action for spoliation.

Alford v. Johnson Cnty. Commissioners, No. 73A04-1702-PL-223, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 29, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Trial court properly dismissed for failure to state a claim a complaint by defendants that the rights of indigent criminal defendants are being ignored because the attorneys assigned as public defenders are burdened by unmanageable caseloads and not providing actual assistance of counsel as required by the United States Constitution and the Indiana Constitution.

McMiller v. State, No. 49A02-1706-CR-1192, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., December 18, 2017).

December 18, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Although the defendant deprived the restaurant of the value of the food and drink consumed when he could not pay the bill, the conviction was reversed because the state failed to prove that he had the requisite intent to commit theft.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 225
  • Page 226
  • Page 227
  • Page 228
  • Page 229
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 602
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs