• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Calvin v. State, No. 02S03-1709-CR-611 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 21, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, M. Massa, Supreme

Despite an argument that it leads to an absurd result, a level 4 burglary conviction could not be enhanced with a habitual-offender finding because defendant’s two prior out-of-state convictions must be treated as Level 6 felonies under Ind. Code 35-50-2-8(b).

Fields v. State, No. 43A03-1704-CR-856, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 22, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss charges against him because the arresting officer was acting as a de facto officer and his failure to take the statutory oath was a technical defect.

Bellwether Properties, LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc., No. 53S04-1703-CT-121, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 20, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Because the complaint does not establish that the statute of limitations had already run when the complaint was filed, Defendant’s T.R. 12(B)(6) motion shouldn’t have been granted.

Shirey v. Flenar, No. 02A03-1704-MI-876, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 21, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, N. Vaidik, T. Crone

Doctor had a duty to preserve plaintiff’s medical records and is properly subject to a cause of action for spoliation.

Alford v. Johnson Cnty. Commissioners, No. 73A04-1702-PL-223, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 29, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Trial court properly dismissed for failure to state a claim a complaint by defendants that the rights of indigent criminal defendants are being ignored because the attorneys assigned as public defenders are burdened by unmanageable caseloads and not providing actual assistance of counsel as required by the United States Constitution and the Indiana Constitution.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 219
  • Go to page 220
  • Go to page 221
  • Go to page 222
  • Go to page 223
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs