In a legal malpractice case, defendants failed to establish, as a matter of law, that plaintiff would not have succeeded in her underlying premises-liability claim; it is a material-factual dispute that the designated evidence establishes that various wires on a hospital-room floor and the risks they pose would be apparent to a reasonable person.
Ivy v. State, No. 82A04-1711-PC-2506, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 4, 2018).
Attempted murder conviction reversed because trial counsel failed to object to improper jury instruction, and tender a proper instruction, regarding the specific intent required to prove accomplice liability.
Robinson v. Ind. Dept. of Local Govt. Finance, No. 45A03-1707-PL-1643,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 9, 2018).
Trial court does not have authority to transfer a case to the Tax Court; the case must be dismissed and refiled.
Batchelor v. State, No. 11A01-1707-CR-1574, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 28, 2018).
Jury instruction that misstated mens rea for resisting law enforcement was a fundamental error that mandated reversal of conviction; it was erroneous for the trial court to give the instruction when the defendant did not request it.
Brewer v. PACCAR, Inc., No. 55A05-1709-CT-2168, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 27, 2018).
A component manufacturer is not immune from liability under the Indiana Product Liability Act; component manufacturer cannot automatically transfer all responsibility to the final manufacturer.