The trial court has inherent power to reconsider its appointment of a special administrator.
Bullock v. State, No. 49A05-1706-CR-1247, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 5, 2018).
Notwithstanding a CCS entry after a mistrial that contained the word judgment, the court had not entered a judgment of conviction and the defendant could be retried
Harr v. Hayes, No. 49A02-1711-CT-2595, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 3, 2018).
Damages were not limited to $75,000 for a case that was remanded to state court because the alleged amount in controversy did not exceed $75,000.
Weekly v. State, No. 20A03-1712-CR-2922, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 29, 2018).
A habitual vehicular substance offender (HVSO) finding does not constitute a separate crime nor result in a separate sentence, but is an enhancement to an underlying felony conviction.
State v. Larkin, No. 46S04-1711-CR-701, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2018).
Delays resulting from defendant’s interlocutory appeal and motion for change of judge are attributable to him when calculating Criminal Rule 4(C) time period.
When there is prosecutorial misconduct, the remedy characteristically imposed is not to dismiss the charges but to suppress the evidence.