• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Brooks v. State, No. 18A-CR-759, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

While defendant showed obnoxious disrespect for authority, her conviction for resisting law enforcement was reversed because strong, powerful, violent means were not shown to be used to evade a law enforcement official’s rightful exercise of his duties.

Granger v. State, No. 18A-CR-1494, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Marijuana grinder is not drug paraphernalia. Paraphernalia is defined as an instrument or device that is used to put or insert a controlled substance into the body and a grinder can only be used to prepare marijuana for ingestion by another means, such as by a joint, a pipe, or a bong.

Weisheit v. State, No. 10S00-1507-PD-413, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 7, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, S. David, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction of the murders of two children, arson, death penalty sentence affirmed; finding that although mistakes were made by trial and appellate counsel most of them did not rise to the level of deficient performance under the Strickland decision, and defendant in any case failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced.

In re Adoption of L.G.K., No. 18A-AD-371, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Trial court properly granted unregistered putative father’s motion for relief from adoption when mother fraudulently claimed that she did not know the identity of child’s father.

Campbell Hausfeld/Scott Fetzer Co. v. Johnson, No. 18S-CT-548, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 1, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Misuse serves as a complete bar to recovery in a products liability action because of the inclusion of comparative fault principles in the Indiana Products Liability Act.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 199
  • Page 200
  • Page 201
  • Page 202
  • Page 203
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 605
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs