• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

State v. Stafford, No. 39S04-1712-CR-749, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 7, 2019).

August 12, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Companion case to Rodriguez v. State reaffirming that trial courts are bound by the terms of a plea agreement and may only modify a sentence in a way that would have been authorized at the time of sentencing.

Cardosi v. State, No. 18S-LW-181, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., August 7, 2019).

August 12, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction of murder and sentence to life in prison without parole upheld, finding that the evidence was sufficient, jurors were properly admonished, co-conspirator’s text messages were properly admitted, reading a withdrawn accomplice liability instruction was not improper, and court properly considered a non-statutory aggravator when imposing sentence.

Wallick v. Inman, No. 18A-CT-2519, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 7, 2019).

August 12, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Altice

The trial judge has broad discretion to rehabilitate jurors and deny for-cause challenges. The trial judge properly denied for-cause challenges after asking the prospective jurors if they could set aside personal biases, beliefs, and prejudices and follow instructions as given.

Murray v. Indianapolis Public Schools, No. 19S-CT-282, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 8, 2019).

August 12, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Student was contributorily negligent for his death when his leaving school to purchase either guns or drugs was not an exercise of reasonable care and caution for his safety.

In re M.I., No. 19S-JT-281, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 9, 2019).

August 12, 2019 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Despite Mother’s ongoing inability to secure suitable housing, the trial court properly concluded that terminating her parental rights would not be in her children’s best interests.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 158
  • Go to page 159
  • Go to page 160
  • Go to page 161
  • Go to page 162
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs