• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Peele v. State, No. 19A-CR-313, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

The warrantless search of the sock that fell from defendant’s pants containing illegal drugs exceeded the proper scope of a Terry search in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, and the evidence obtained in the search should not have been admitted at trial.

Laboa v. State, No. 18A-CR-951, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

When a meritorious PCR petition was filed by a pro se petitioner, and neither party moved for summary disposition, the post-conviction court should have either ordered the cause to be submitted by affidavit or held an evidentiary hearing.

Campbell v. Eary, No. 19A-MI-6, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A grandparent visitation order does not survive the subsequent marriage of the natural parents of a child born out of wedlock.

Hayden v. Franciscan Alliance, Inc., No. 18A-CT-1777, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 19, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

When an employee accessed medical records for non-employment-related reasons in direct violation of a confidentiality agreement, the trial court properly granted employer’s motion for summary judgment on respondeat superior and negligent hiring and retention of the employee.

Smith v. State, No. 18A-CR-3009, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 7, 2019).

August 12, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, E. Tavitas

The State failed to establish police officer’s decision to impound defendant’s vehicle adhered to established departmental routine or regulation. While evidence of the department’s written procedure need not be introduced, more than conclusory testimony from an officer is required.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 147
  • Go to page 148
  • Go to page 149
  • Go to page 150
  • Go to page 151
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs