• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Johnson v. State, No. 20S-CR-61, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 22, 2020).

May 26, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

A general waiver of a right to appeal a sentence in plea agreement, when contained in the same sentence as an unenforceable waiver of post-conviction relief, is insufficiently explicit to establish a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal a sentence.

Wahl v. State, No. 19A-CR-2258, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 12, 2020).

May 18, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas, P. Mathias, P. Riley

Video reenactment may be taken with consent and questions during such reenactment due not amount to custodial interrogation where the officer’s inquiry is merely general on-the-scene questioning as to facts surrounding a crime or other general questioning of citizens in the fact-finding process.

Harris v. State, No. 19A-CR-1863, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2020).

May 18, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas, N. Vaidik

Pursuant to Indiana Rule of Evidence 615(c), the parent of a juvenile waived to adult court is a person whose presence a party shows to be essential to presenting the party’s claim or defense.

FM Nephrology Partners N. Central Ind. Dialysis Centers, LLC v. Meritain Health, Inc., No. 20S-PL-302, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 11, 2020).

May 18, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Case was not preempted by ERISA when a health-care provider sued defendant health-insurance plans, which are governed by ERISA, allege they failed to pay agreed reimbursement rates for covered services under their plans.

Batchelder v. Ind. University Health Care Assoc., No. 19A-CT-2569, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 14, 2020).

May 18, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

When there are joint tortfeasors in a medical malpractice action, the trial court should not prematurely set off a settlement to the statutory limit without first determining the value of case.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 128
  • Go to page 129
  • Go to page 130
  • Go to page 131
  • Go to page 132
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs