• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Hickingbottom v. State, No. 18A-CR-627, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 8, 2019).

April 8, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

The State must produce the DOC manual on use of force by their officers when prosecuting an inmate for the crime of battery resulting in injury to a public safety officer.

Fairbanks v. State, No. 18S-CR-604, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 27, 2019).

April 1, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

The State may introduce Rule 404(B) other-bad-acts evidence to show lack of accident only (1) when the State has “reliable assurance” that an accident defense will be raised, or (2) after the defendant places accident at issue at trial, and when the evidence’s prejudicial impact will not substantially outweigh its probative value.

Batchelor v. State, No. 18S-CR-436, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 18, 2019).

March 25, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

For the resisting-by-fleeing offense, trial courts should use Indiana Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction 5.3040, and discontinue using Instruction 22.

Walters v. State, No. 18A-CR-1021, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 22, 2019).

March 25, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

The certificate offered to authenticate cell phone records did not properly authenticate the records because it was issued approximately eighteen months after the records were obtained, does not contain the phone number for which the search warrant requested records, does not contain the number of pages it purports to authenticate, and does not contain the dates the records encompass.

Linville v. State, No. 18A-CR-983, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 22, 2019).

March 25, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

The Court of Appeals reduced the trial court’s restitution order because a trial court cannot order a defendant to pay restitution for crimes to which he did not plead guilty.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 83
  • Go to page 84
  • Go to page 85
  • Go to page 86
  • Go to page 87
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 327
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs