• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

State v. Ellis, No. 20A-CR-61, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2020).

August 10, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Community corrections participants “who have consented or been clearly informed that the conditions of their…community corrections program unambiguously authorize warrantless and suspicionless searches may thereafter be subject to such searches during the period of their . . . community corrections status.”

State v. Herrmann, No. 20A-CR-307, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 29, 2020).

August 3, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

While it is well settled that if the elected prosecutor has a conflict of interest, the whole office is disqualified; it is not necessary to disqualify the whole office if one deputy has a conflict of interest.

Willet v. State, No. 19A-CR-2699, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 31, 2020).

August 3, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb, N. Vaidik

Petition which challenges release date of parole based on a claim that Petitioner’s sentence has expired, is properly filed as a habeas corpus petition

Spencer v. State, No. 20A-MI-636, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 3, 2020).

August 3, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

To be a sexually violent predator as defined by Indiana Code Section 35-38-1-7.5, a defendant must have committed a crime that is substantially equivalent to the offenses listed in subsections (A) through (J) of the statute, and for child molesting “as a…Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, or Level 4 felony (for a crime committed after June 30, 2014)[.]”

Elliott v. State, No. 19A-CR-2498, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 17, 2020).

July 20, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

The clergyman privilege applies only to confidential communications made to a clergyman in the clergyman’s professional character as a spiritual adviser or counselor and confessions or admissions made to a clergyman in the course of discipline enjoined by the clergyman’s church.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 58
  • Page 59
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 330
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs