• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Clark v. State, No. 20S05-1301-CR-10, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Sept. 17, 2013).

September 27, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction is reversed because the police search at a rental storage unit that led to his arrest violated his Fourth Amendment protections.

McWhorter v. State, No. 33S01-1301-PC-7, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Sept. 12, 2013).

September 13, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Adheres to Indiana position that verdicts are not reviewable for being “inconsistent, contradictory, or irreconcilable,” and holds that collateral estoppel does not prevent defendant acquitted of murder from being retried for manslaughter in this case.

Turner v. State, No. 49A05-1302-CR-59, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 3, 2013).

September 5, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Discusses argument that statements of State’s confidential informant were not hearsay under the party-opponent hearsay exception.

Becker v. State, No. 45S03-1301-CR-9, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Aug. 22, 2013).

August 29, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Under a supreme court 2011 decision, Indiana ex post facto law would have allowed lifetime sex offender registration to apply to Becker, but a 2008 trial court ruling to the contrary was res judicata against the State on the issue, as the local prosecutor’s representation in the 2008 litigation was in privity with the DOC’s intervention in 2011 seeking to impose lifetime registration status based on the 2011 opinion.

Morris v. State, No. 14A05-1209-CR-495, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 23, 2013).

August 29, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, M. Barnes

A trial court may order restitution in a case in which there is a plea bargain silent on the restitution issue as long as the bargain is “open” and leaves sentencing entirely to the court’s discretion.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 217
  • Go to page 218
  • Go to page 219
  • Go to page 220
  • Go to page 221
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 323
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs