• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Gonzalez v. State, No. 52A02-1306-CR-526, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 4, 2013).

February 6, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Restitution sentence for payment to workman’s compensation insurer of amounts it paid for victim’s medical treatment and lost wages was proper, but restitution could not be ordered for the permanent partial impairment settlement paid to the victim.

Cleary v. State, No. 45A03-1212-CR-518, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan 24, 2014).

January 30, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes, T. Crone

When defendant was charged with both greater and lesser included offenses, and the jury hung on the greater offenses but convicted on the lessers, because the trial court did not enter judgment on the lesser I.C. 35-41-4-3 did not bar retrial of the greater offenses.

Campbell v. State, No. 13A05-1304-PC-201, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 28, 2014).

January 30, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Suggests a modification to Pattern Jury Instruction 9.05 on the definition of “intentionally.”

Meadows v. State, No. 39A01-1305-CR-215, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 29, 2014).

January 30, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Statutes mandating credit for time served for probation and community corrections do not apply to a person in a conviction-deferral drug court program, so that it was within the program judge’s discretion to refuse to award credit for time served when the court terminated the defendant’s placement in the program.

Aslinger v. State, No. 35A02-1303-CR-296, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 23, 2014).

January 23, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb, P. Riley

Terry stop was improperly extended with a search for evidence. Instruction on methamphetamine manufacturing defense of being “briefly in” 1,000 feet of a park was properly rejected because the defendant was charged with dealing, not manufacturing, even though the charged was “grounded in manufacturing.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 216
  • Go to page 217
  • Go to page 218
  • Go to page 219
  • Go to page 220
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 328
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs