• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Corbally v. State, No. 41A04-1304-CR-175, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 19, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Testimony by police investigator of victim’s statement to investigator was inadmissible hearsay, and while defendant withdrew his hearsay objection he did not waive the objection under the circumstances

Moss v. State, No. 49A02-1307-CR-618, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 20, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

When defendant had his prior felony conviction reduced to a misdemeanor, after he was charged in this case with C felony handgun without a license based on the prior felony, his motion to dismiss the C felony should have been granted even though he had the prior felony conviction when the handgun offense was committed.

Hicks v. State, No. 82A01-1306-CR-256, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 11, 2014).

March 13, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

When “basic questions” asked by police in “pre-interview” did not result in a confession, there was no violation of Missouri v. Seibert’s rule that police cannot purposefully withhold Miranda warnings to get a confession and then secure a Miranda waiver, based on the first confession, before questioning to get a second confession.

Fernandez v. California, No. 12-7822, __ U.S. __ (Feb. 25, 2014).

February 28, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. Alito, SCOTUS

When one occupant had consented to officers’ home entry and the other had refused consent, after officers arrested the objecting occupant and then returned an hour later and again obtained the first occupant’s consent, the officers’ entry was legal.

Harper v. State, No. 49A04-1305-CR-222, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 26, 2014).

February 28, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Officer who lies to gain entrance to a home, without exigent circumstances and after consensual entry was denied, is not acting within the course of official duties so as to justify the arrest of the home owner for resisting arrest.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 216
  • Page 217
  • Page 218
  • Page 219
  • Page 220
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 330
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs