• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Rutledge v. State, No. 85A04-1407-CR-330, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 19, 2015).

March 19, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Circumstances leading to defendant’s OWI arrest amounted to a consensual encounter, but even considering the police action to have been an investigatory stop it was permitted by the Fourth Amendment and Indiana Constitution, Article I, Section 11.

Johnson v. State, No. 49A02-1406-CR-437, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 6, 2015).

March 12, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

A trial court need not conduct an indigency hearing at the time probation fees are ordered, but must hold such a hearing before or upon completion of the sentence; probation fees “should reflect the time a defendant actually served on probation.”

J.B. v. State, No. 53A01-1408-CR-367, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 10, 2015).

March 12, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Trial court’s earlier “earned dismissal” of misdemeanor conviction did not make the conviction records inaccessible, so that the expungement remedy was still available despite the earlier dismissal.

Cupello v. State, No. 49A02-1406-CR-394, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 11, 2015).

March 12, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, P. Mathias

Homeowner prevailed with his “Castle Doctrine” statutory defense to a charge of battery on a law enforcement officer when the officer had unlawfully entered the home by putting his foot in the threshold of the front door.

D.Y. v. State, No. 49A02-1405-JV-298, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 11, 2015).

March 12, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

When officer told juvenile he would be transported to the police station, the juvenile was “seized” for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, and as the office had no probable cause to believe the juvenile had committed a crime the firearm the officer found in patting the juvenile down was inadmissible.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 186
  • Go to page 187
  • Go to page 188
  • Go to page 189
  • Go to page 190
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs