• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Rodriguez v. United States, No. 13-9972, __ U.S. __ (April 21, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Kennedy, C. Thomas, R. Ginsburg, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Fourth Amendment does not allow police to extend duration of a traffic stop, even for a “de minimis” time period, for reasons unrelated the matter for which the stop was made.

Moore v. State, No. 49A05-1408-CR-398, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, M. Robb

Savings statute for the revised penal code did not prohibit application of the revised sentence modification statute, which does not require prosecutorial consent to a modification petition, to a petition to modify a crime committed and sentenced prior to the July 1, 2014 effective date of the modification statute’s revision.

M.M. v. State, No. 49A02-1409-JV-639, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A juvenile restitution order does not end on the juvenile’s discharge from probation, and action to collect the restitution may be taken after the probation ends.

J.B. v. State, No. 49A02-1409-JV-688, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 23, 2005).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Police officer’s temporary detention of juvenile on sidewalk to investigate whether item juvenile had discarded was a handgun was a reasonable action under the totality of the circumstances and did not violate the Indiana Constitution’s search protection in Article 1, Section 11.

Woodcox v. State, No. 15A05-1410-CR-468, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 14, 2015).

April 16, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

When judgment of conviction was for an A felony but the entry of judgment was for a B felony, defendant’s motion to correct erroneous sentence was properly denied and a nunc pro tunc entry of judgment for an A felony was ordered on remand.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 187
  • Page 188
  • Page 189
  • Page 190
  • Page 191
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 329
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs