• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Taylor v. State, No. 82S00-1610-LW-576, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 5, 2017).

December 11, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, Supreme

Seventeen-year-old defendant’s LWOP sentence for murder and conspiracy to commit murder reduced to an aggregate eighty-year term.

Polk v. State, No. 49A02-1703-CR-622, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 30, 2017).

December 4, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

When a person is placed on probation for a felony conviction, the trial court is statutorily required to impose probation fees and may not direct the probation department to conduct a financial assessment. The trial court must also conduct an indigency hearing.

Whitaker v. State, No. 49A02-1706-CR-1162, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2017).

November 27, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

The trial court, not the probation department, has the sole discretion to impose probation fees under Ind. Code § 35-38-2-1(e) and Ind. Code § 35-38-2-1.7(b).

Edmonson v. State, No. 84A01-1609-PC-2150, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 9, 2017).

November 13, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Defendant’s PCR petition was not barred by the doctrine of laches because State failed to show prejudice; however, he was properly denied relief because the trial court was not required to advise him of collateral consequences of his guilty plea.

W.R. v. State, No. 17A03-1703-XP-571, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 1, 2017).

November 6, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to expunge drug-dealing convictions because petitioner’s job includes going into businesses and the nature of the convictions might be relevant to businesses deciding whether to exclude petitioner from their premises.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 106
  • Go to page 107
  • Go to page 108
  • Go to page 109
  • Go to page 110
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs