• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Freeman v. Timberland Home Center, Inc., No. 19A-CC-1889, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 29, 2020).

May 4, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Preferred venue status of a county is determined when an action is commenced by the filing of a complaint; if the county where the complaint was filed is a preferred venue, transfer to another county based on venue is improper even if a third-party is later joined.

Jacob v. Vigh, No. 19A-CT-2719, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 27, 2020).

April 27, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A trial court has jurisdiction over a complaint that includes allegations that an attorney violated canons of the Rules of Professional Conduct when the complaint also alleges other claims such as fraud, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty, and legal malpractice.

Walters v. Corder, No. 19A-TR-1069, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 8, 2020).

April 13, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Children that were adopted out of the family after the settlor’s death retained their status as beneficiaries of the trust.

Robertson v. State, No. 19S-PL-432, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 30, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, S. David, Supreme

For the claims to recover public funds pursuant to Ind. Code § 5-11-5-1(a), the limitations period begins to run only after the Office of the Indiana Attorney General receives a final, verified report from the State Board of Accounts. Claims pursuant to the Crime Victims Relief Act are governed by the discovery rule.

Perkins v. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, No. 20S-CT-233, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 31, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, M. Massa, Supreme

Testimony compelled by a subpoena or other statutory duty is protected under the public policy exception to at-will employment.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 63
  • Go to page 64
  • Go to page 65
  • Go to page 66
  • Go to page 67
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs