• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re Power of Attorney of DeHart, No. 21A-GM-1043, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 17, 2021).

December 20, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Shepard

When a request for accounting under a power of attorney is made, the person holding the power of attorney has the burden to prove the accounting is not in the power of attorney’s best interests.

Wilkes v. Celadon Group, Inc., No. 19S-CT-564, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 6, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Carriers have the primary duty for loading and securing cargo. If the shipper assumes a legal duty of safe loading, it becomes liable for injuries resulting from any latent defect.

Ladra v. State, No. 21S-CT-235, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

When the government knows of an existing defect in a public thoroughfare, and when it has ample opportunity to respond, immunity does not apply simply because the defect manifests during recurring inclement weather.

Staat v. Ind. Dept. of Transportation, No. 21S-CT-240, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

A government entity is “not liable” for a loss or injury resulting from the “temporary condition of a public thoroughfare . . . that results from weather.” Because the evidence designated by the government establishes that the weather-induced condition continued to worsen at the time of the accident, the Court holds that the condition was temporary and the government immune from liability.

Reinoehl v. St. Joseph Cnty. Health Dept., __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 3, 2021).

December 6, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Complaint, alleging various causes of action related to the schooling of plaintiffs’ children while there were COVID-19 restrictions, was properly dismissed pursuant to TR 12(B)(6).

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 45
  • Go to page 46
  • Go to page 47
  • Go to page 48
  • Go to page 49
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs