• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Wilkes v. Celadon Group, Inc., No. 19S-CT-564, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 6, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Carriers have the primary duty for loading and securing cargo. If the shipper assumes a legal duty of safe loading, it becomes liable for injuries resulting from any latent defect.

Ladra v. State, No. 21S-CT-235, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

When the government knows of an existing defect in a public thoroughfare, and when it has ample opportunity to respond, immunity does not apply simply because the defect manifests during recurring inclement weather.

Staat v. Ind. Dept. of Transportation, No. 21S-CT-240, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

A government entity is “not liable” for a loss or injury resulting from the “temporary condition of a public thoroughfare . . . that results from weather.” Because the evidence designated by the government establishes that the weather-induced condition continued to worsen at the time of the accident, the Court holds that the condition was temporary and the government immune from liability.

Reinoehl v. St. Joseph Cnty. Health Dept., __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 3, 2021).

December 6, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Complaint, alleging various causes of action related to the schooling of plaintiffs’ children while there were COVID-19 restrictions, was properly dismissed pursuant to TR 12(B)(6).

Payne-Elliott v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolis, Inc., No. 21A-CP-936, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 23, 2021).

November 29, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Trial court improperly granted T.R. 12(B)(1) motion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because a fact-sensitive and claim-specific analysis is required to determine whether the First Amendment bars the claims against the church, the issue was not ripe for disposition.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 43
  • Go to page 44
  • Go to page 45
  • Go to page 46
  • Go to page 47
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 253
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs