Under the Hague Convention, interests of children in matters relating to their custody are best served when decisions are made in the child’s country of habitual residence. Determination of a child’s habitual residence is fact-intensive and varies with the circumstances of each case.
Civil
B.M. v. A.J, No. 21A-PO-2290, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 29, 2022).
Trial court judge’s statements throughout protection order hearing demonstrate that judge failed to preside over the hearing as a neutral, impartial decision maker and violated defendants’ due process rights.
Legacy Builders Ind., Inc. v. Crocker No. 21A-CT-2255, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 29, 2022).
Trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants because plaintiff failed to serve a summons with the complaint.
In re change of gender of O.J.G.S., No. 21A-MI-2096, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 2, 2022).
Ind. Code § 16-37-2-10 does not grant courts the authority to order a change of gender marker on a birth certificate.
Community Health Network, Inc. v. McKenzie, No. 20S-CT-648, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 13, 2022).
The public disclosure of private facts is a viable tort claim.