• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re A.C., No. 22A-JC-49, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 21, 2022).

October 24, 2022 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Transgender child’s continued removal is not contrary to the CHINS-6 statute and does not violate the parents’ constitutional rights to the care, custody, and control of child or to their rights to the free exercise of religion. Parents have the right to exercise their religious beliefs, but they do not have the right to exercise them in a manner that causes physical or emotional harm to child. Trial court’s temporary restriction on the discussion of child’s transgender identity outside of family therapy does not violate the parents’ free speech rights.

Perry v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 22A-CT-605, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2022).

October 17, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Federal civil rights violation and state law defamation claims against DCS case manager were properly dismissed for failure to state claims upon which relief could be granted; the case manager had qualified immunity.

Mellowitz v. Ball State University, No. 22A-PL-337, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2022).

October 11, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Ind. Code § 34-12-5-7, which bars class actions against post-secondary educational institutions for claims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment arising from COVID-19, impermissibly conflicts with T.R. 23 and so it is a nullity.

In re Z.D., No. 22A-JC-875, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 28, 2022).

October 3, 2022 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

When a party’s first appearance in a case is made in person when it should have been virtual, the court should be hesitant to treat that appearance as defiant or otherwise improper. A parent who requests a contested CHINS fact-finding hearing has a constitutional right to that hearing, and a parent does not forfeit that right by appearing in person to a virtual hearing.

J.L. v. M.M., No. 22A-PO-512, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 6, 2022).

September 12, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

The protection order statutes should not be used as a de facto method to modify custody and/or parenting time. However, the protection order statutes offer expedited and ex parte proceedings to provide a “stop gap” to stabilize the situation until the trial court can determine the best interests of the child in a modification proceeding.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 31
  • Go to page 32
  • Go to page 33
  • Go to page 34
  • Go to page 35
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs